From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2024-04-01 16:23:20
Ivan Matek wrote:
> Also there is nothing preventing those people who do not wish to adapt to
> keep using boost 1.70 or whatever version has shared_ptr.
We are not talking about shared_ptr here, but about everything else in
the smart pointers library that has no standard equivalent.
But even if we were talking about just shared_ptr, how would I develop
it further? Fork Boost from 1.70 and proceed there?
If you want Boost without SmartPtr, delete it from your copy and carry
on.