From: Sebastian Redl (sebastian.redl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-10 19:26:17

• Next message: Joel de Guzman: "Re: [Boost-users] [serialization] skipping data"
• Previous message: Joel de Guzman: "Re: [Boost-users] [serialization] skipping data"
• In reply to: Ovanes Markarian: "[Boost-users] interested to know your opinion on possible feature"
• Next in thread: Ovanes Markarian: "Re: [Boost-users] interested to know your opinion on possible feature"

Ovanes Markarian wrote:

>In my current project is a need to implement an optional type, this type is considered to be lazy.
>I am wondering why C++ or Boost do not offer this possibility.
>
>
In what way does Boost.Optional fail to meet your needs?

Sebastian Redl

• Next message: Joel de Guzman: "Re: [Boost-users] [serialization] skipping data"
• Previous message: Joel de Guzman: "Re: [Boost-users] [serialization] skipping data"
• In reply to: Ovanes Markarian: "[Boost-users] interested to know your opinion on possible feature"
• Next in thread: Ovanes Markarian: "Re: [Boost-users] interested to know your opinion on possible feature"