From: Andrew Holden (aholden_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-12 10:57:49
Scott McMurray wrote
> My apologies, I didn't know that. Certainly a very nice feature as it
> means that even without the virtual destructor both would be safe.
>
> Promises to double-check the documentation before replying next time,
No worries. It wasn't exactly a highly advertised feature. Besides,
the note implied that older versions of shared pointer didn't do that,
so I just figured you learned about shared pointers before they added
it.
Andrew