From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-24 10:42:42

• Next message: Johan Råde: "Re: [Boost-users] [array] VC++ 7.1 bug and a proposed fix"
• Previous message: John Maddock: "Re: [Boost-users] [array] VC++ 7.1 bug and a proposed fix"
• In reply to: John Maddock: "Re: [Boost-users] [array] VC++ 7.1 bug and a proposed fix"
• Next in thread: Johan Råde: "Re: [Boost-users] [array] VC++ 7.1 bug and a proposed fix"
• Reply: Johan Råde: "Re: [Boost-users] [array] VC++ 7.1 bug and a proposed fix"
• Reply: John Maddock: "Re: [Boost-users] [array] VC++ 7.1 bug and a proposed fix"

John Maddock wrote:

> Boost.Array is not intended to be either copy-constructable or
> assignable, so instantiating a function returning an array-by-value
> *should* fail to compile.

What makes you think so?

• Next message: Johan Råde: "Re: [Boost-users] [array] VC++ 7.1 bug and a proposed fix"
• Previous message: John Maddock: "Re: [Boost-users] [array] VC++ 7.1 bug and a proposed fix"
• In reply to: John Maddock: "Re: [Boost-users] [array] VC++ 7.1 bug and a proposed fix"
• Next in thread: Johan Råde: "Re: [Boost-users] [array] VC++ 7.1 bug and a proposed fix"
• Reply: Johan Råde: "Re: [Boost-users] [array] VC++ 7.1 bug and a proposed fix"
• Reply: John Maddock: "Re: [Boost-users] [array] VC++ 7.1 bug and a proposed fix"