From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-31 00:03:54


"John Maddock" <john_at_[hidden]> writes:

> So I'm left with thinking that gcc is being unreasonable frankly and the
> code should stay as it is

I agree.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com